Propofol versus Fospropofol Disodium for Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Adults
Expand
1.Tai′an Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shandong Tai′an 271000, China; 2.The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Tai′an 271000, China; 3.The Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Tai′an, Shandong Tai′an 271000, China
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium versus propofol for anesthesia in adult patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy, focusing onthe potential of fospropofol disodium to reduce respiratory depression and injection pain, and to guide anesthetic selection in patients with differing risk profiles. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 80 adult patients (ASA physical status Ⅰ-Ⅱ) scheduled for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy between October 2023 and December 2024 were enrolled. They were randomly assigned via a computer-generated random number table to receive either propofol (Group A, n=40) or fospropofol disodium (Group B, n=40). We compared the procedure duration, recovery time, and time to discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Hemodynamic parameters, including blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation (SpO2), were monitored at predefined time points. The incidence of adverse events such as hypotension, respiratory depression, and injection pain was recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: No significant intergroup difference was found in procedure duration (P>0.05). However, Group B exhibited significantly shorter recovery time and PACU discharge time than Group A (P<0.001). During anesthesia induction and maintenance (T1, T2, T3), mean arterial pressure, heart rate levels were significantly higher in Group B (P<0.05). The incidence of hypotension, respiratory depression, and injection pain was significantly lower in Group B (P<0.05). In contrast, the rates of nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, and coughing did not differ significantly between groups (P>0.05). Further analysis indicated a number needed to treat (NNT) of 5 to prevent one case of respiratory depression, equating to approximately 200 fewer events per 1000 patients. Conclusion: Compared with propofol, fospropofol disodium provides superior hemodynamic stability and significantly reduces the incidence of respiratory depression and injection pain during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults. Althoughit is particularly suitable for ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients at risk of respiratory compromise, the final selection should be individualized based on patient characteristics and procedural requirements.