• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

• 药品评价-循证医学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

ERCC1基因多态性与非小细胞肺癌患者铂类化疗疗效相关性的Meta分析

张凌雄,张阳,宋沧桑,杨琨琨   

  1. 昆明市第一人民医院,昆明市第一人民医院,昆明市第一人民医院,昆明市第一人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-21 修回日期:2018-12-16 出版日期:2018-12-25 发布日期:2018-12-25
  • 基金资助:
    云南省卫生科技计划项目(No.2017NS088)

A Meta-analysis of the Association Between ERCC1 Gene Polymorphisms and the Efficacy of Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

zhanglingxiong,, and   

  1. The First People''s Hospital of Kunming City,,,
  • Received:2018-10-21 Revised:2018-12-16 Online:2018-12-25 Published:2018-12-25

摘要: 目的:系统评价切除修复交叉互补基因1(ERCC1)基因多态性与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者铂类化疗疗效之间的相关性,确定ERCC1基因多态性是否能作为NSCLC患者铂类化疗疗效的预测指标,并把循证医学与精准化药物治疗方案有机结合,为铂类药物临床用药剂量的调整提供依据,以提高化疗方案的有效率。方法:系统检索涉及ERCC1基因多态性与NSCLC患者铂类化疗疗效相关性的研究,检索的数据库包括英文数据库:PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library;中文数据库:CBM、CNKI、WANFANG、VIP。建立严格的文献纳入和排除标准,筛选出高质量的队列研究进行Meta分析,分析的结局指标为客观缓解率(ORR),通过计算合并比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)来评估单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)与ORR之间的联系,所有分析均使用Review Manager 5.3进行。结果:共18篇相关研究,2 380名NSCLC患者被纳入到本次Meta分析中。根据本次研究的结果,并没有发现ERCC1基因多态性与NSCLC患者铂类化疗疗效之间存在相关性的统计学证据。ERCC1 C118T:显性模型(CT+TT vs CC:OR=0.95,95%CI=0.68~1.34,P=0.78),共显性模型(CT vs CC:OR=0.77,95%CI=0.57~1.03,P=0.08;TT vs CC:OR=1.00,95%CI=0.49~2.05,P=0.99)。ERCC1 C8092A:显性模型(CA+AA vs CC:OR=1.00,95%CI=0.79~1.27,P=0.98),共显性模型(CA vs CC:OR=0.85,95%CI=0.56~1.29,P=0.44;AA vs CC:OR=0.54,95%CI=0.09~3.36,P=0.51)。结论:本次Meta分析没有发现ERCC1基因多态性与NSCLC患者铂类化疗疗效之间存在相关性,研究证据尚不足以证明ERCC1基因多态性可预测NSCLC患者铂类化疗的疗效。但是鉴于本次Meta分析的局限性和异质性,所得结论需要谨慎解读,未来需要更大规模的前瞻性研究与更严格的研究设计予以验证。

Abstract: Objective:The relationship between Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1(ERCC1) gene polymorphisms and the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was systematically evaluated to determine whether ERCC1 gene polymorphisms could be used as a predictor of the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. And the organic combination of evidence based medicine and precision drug treatment regimen, to provide a basis for the adjustment of the clinical dose of platinum drugs, in order to improve the efficiency of chemotherapy regimens.Methods: All studies involving the association of the ERCC1 gene polymorphisms with the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC patients were systematically searched, including English database: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library; Chinese database: CBM, CNKI, WANFANG, VIP. Establish strict inclusion and exclusion criteria for the literatures, screen high-quality cohort studies for Meta-analysis. The outcome of the analysis is objective response rate (ORR). The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and ORR was assessed by calculating the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyzes were performed using the Review Manager version 5.3.Results: A total of 18 related studies, 2380 NSCLC patients were included in this Meta-analysis. According to the results of this study, there was no statistical evidence of a association between the ERCC1 gene polymorphisms and the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. ERCC1 C118T: dominant model (CT + TT vs CC: OR=0.95, 95% CI=0.68-1.34,P=0.78), and the codominant model (CT vs CC: OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.57-1.03,P=0.08; TT vs CC: OR=1.00, 95% CI=0.49-2.05,P=0.99). ERCC1 C8092A: dominant model (CA + AA vs CC: OR=1.00, 95% CI=0.79-1.27,P=0.98), and the codominant model (CA vs CC: OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.56-1.29,P=0.44; AA vs CC: OR=0.54, 95% CI=0.09-3.36,P=0.51).Conclusion: This Meta-analysis found no association between ERCC1 gene polymorphisms and the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. The research evidence is not sufficient to prove that ERCC1 gene polymorphisms can predict the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. However, given the limitations and heterogeneity of this Meta-analysis, the conclusions need to be interpreted cautiously. The future requires larger prospective studies and more rigorous research designs to test these conclusions.