• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

• 药物经济学 • 上一篇    下一篇

贝伐单抗用于治疗非小细胞肺癌的药物经济学研究

戈颖莹,陈永法   

  1. 中国药科大学国际医药商学院,中国药科大学国际医药商学院
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-20 修回日期:2017-11-20 出版日期:2017-12-25 发布日期:2017-12-25

Literature Review of Pharmacoeconomic on Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Cancer(NSCLC)

GE Ying-ying and   

  1. School of International Pharmaceutical Business,
  • Received:2017-11-20 Revised:2017-11-20 Online:2017-12-25 Published:2017-12-25

摘要: 目的:综合评价贝伐单抗用于治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的药物经济学研究,探讨贝伐单抗的临床疗效和成本效益。方法:从Pubmed、CNKI数据库检索有关贝伐单抗用于NSCLC治疗的药物经济学分析的中英文文献,综述评价结果。结果:纳入综述研究的11篇文献显示,在一线治疗中低剂量使用贝伐单抗联合双药化疗较单一化疗具有一定的成本-效果优势,在维持阶段、高剂量使用或与培美曲塞对照组相比,贝伐单抗的经济性优势并不明确。结论:贝伐单抗成本较高,国际研究结果尚不能适用于我国,需进一步开展基于我国数据的药物经济学评价。

Abstract: Objective: Literature review pharmacoeconomic analysis on patientsundergoing non-small cell cancer(NSClC) been treated with Bevacizumab, to explore efficacy and cost effectiveness of Bevacizumab(Bev). Methods: We searched the Chinese and English literature of pharmacoeconomic analysis of Bevacizumab on Pubmed and CNKI database, and then reviewed pharmacoeconomic results of targeted drugs. Results: Among the eleven articles,compared with chemotherapy, Bev-containing regimen was reported to have cost-effectiveness in first line treatment with low dosage. But the cost-effectiveness of Bev-containing regimen is not clear in high dosage, for maintenance therapy and compared with pemetrexed/cisplatin.Conclusion:Bevacizumab is costly and the international results of the studys is not suitable for our country. Futher studys, comprehensive economic evaluation based on China date should be done.