• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

中国药物评价 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 321-325.

• 专栏 •    下一篇

单个病例数据Meta分析合作能力研究

田金徽,夏淼,杨克虎,Fujian Song,张俊华   

  1. 兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学公共卫生学院;兰州大学公共卫生学院,兰州大学循证医学中心,,
  • 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2019-10-28
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室开放基金(项目编号:20170203;项目名称:循证医学方法学研究)

The Analysis of Collaboration Capacity of Authors, Organizations and Countries of the Individual Patient Data Meta Analysis

  1. Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University,,,,
  • Online:2019-10-28 Published:2019-10-28

摘要: 目的:分析单个病例数据Meta分析(individual patient data meta analysis,IPDMA)的作者、研究机构和国家之间的合作能力。方法:检索主要英文数据库获取IPDMA,依据纳入排除标准选取IPDMA。用Excel软件提取作者、研究机构和国家等信息,用BICOMS 2软件对提取的作者、研究机构和国家等信息进行整理,然后利用NetDraw绘制作者、研究机构和国家网络社会关系图。结果:共有来自69个国家,2 353个研究机构的1 588名作者参与了558篇IPDMA撰写,发文前3位的国家是英国、美国和荷兰,发文前3位研究机构是牛津大学、悉尼大学和多伦多大学,发文前3位的作者是Pignon JP、Clarke M和Burdett S,32名作者形成2个研究团队,59个研究机构和69个国家之间均有合作。结论:IPDMA研究在国家和研究机构之间分布不平衡,欧洲和北美洲的国家和研究机构占据主导地位。

关键词: 单个病例数据Meta分析, 合作能力

Abstract: Objective: To analysis the collaboration capacity of authors, organizations and countries of the Individual Patient Data Meta Analysis(IPDMA). Methods: We searched main English database access to English IPDMA, and the IPDMA were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data extraction sheet was established by Excel software, the name and number of authors, organizations and countries were extracted. The BICOMS 2 software was used to manage the related information on the authors, organizations and countries. The NetDraw software was used to reduce the network of authors, organizations and countries. Results: 558 IPDMA were analyzed, which were finished by 69 countries, 2 353 organizations, and 1 588 authors, the top three countries were United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands, the top three organizations were University of Oxford, University of Sydney and University of Toronto, the top three authors were Pignon JP, Clarke M and Burdett S. The 32 authors formed two cooperative groups, at the same time, there were cooperation among the 59 organizations and 69 counties. Conclusion: There were imbalance between the countries and organizations in the number of IPDMA, and most of IPDMA was came from the countries and organizations of Europe and North America.

Key words: Individual patient data meta analysis, Collaboration capacity