• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

中国药物评价 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 55-60.

• 循证医学评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

六味地黄丸联合不同方案治疗2型糖尿病的疗效及安全性Meta分析

石东妮,熊吴燕,卢海霞   

  1. 贵州医科大学护理学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-08 修回日期:2020-01-22 出版日期:2020-02-28 发布日期:2020-03-30

Efficacy and Safety of Liuweidihuang Decoction Combined with Different Conventional Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus:A Meta-analysis

  • Received:2020-01-08 Revised:2020-01-22 Online:2020-02-28 Published:2020-03-30
  • Contact: Xiong WuYan E-mail:289422451@qq.com

摘要: 目的:系统评价六味地黄丸联合不同方案治疗2型糖尿病的疗效及安全性。方法:计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、万方数据库(WANGFANG)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library,从2017年1月1日至2019年8月19日发表的中文文献及近10年收录的英文文献,收集六味地黄丸治疗2型糖尿病的随机对照试验(RCT)。通过Cochrane风险评价表评价研究质量,由2名研究员独立筛选文献、提取资料、评价偏倚风险后,运用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析,共检索出281篇文献,最终纳入16篇RCT,共计1 743例患者。结果:Meta分析显示:六味地黄丸联合常规治疗总有效率优于常规治疗[Rr=1.24,95%CI(1.19,1.29),P<0.000 01],空腹血糖(FBG)[MD=-0.45,95%CI(-0.62,-0.27),P<0.000 01],糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)[MD=-0.41,95%CI(-0.58,-0.24),P<0.000 01]也是优于常规治疗组。结论:六味地黄丸联合多种不同方案治疗2型糖尿病具有较好的疗效及安全性,且各个不同治疗方案间差异性无统计学意义,可见六味地黄丸治疗糖尿病具有疗效且不受常规治疗影响。但由于纳入文献质量不高,未来需要通过更严谨、样本量更大的高质量、多中心的三盲随机对照试验进一步验证。

关键词: Meta分析, 2型糖尿病, 六味地黄丸, 中西医结合疗法, 随机对照试验

Abstract: Objective:To systematically evaluate therapeutic efficacy and safety of liuweidihuang decoction combined with different conventional treatmentsfor type 2 diabetes mellitus and explainthe curative effect of liuweidihuang decoction. Methods: Four Chinese databases(CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, CBM)andthree English databases (PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library) are searched systematically from January 1,2017 to August 19, 2019 for Chinese literature and For English literature, the time is from January 1,2009 to August 19, 2019, to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the treatment of Liuweidihuang decoction for type 2diabetes mellitus.Two investigators independently performed literature screening, data extraction and bias risk assessment.RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis. Finally 281 literaturewere retrieved and 16 studies were included in this study, involving 1 743 patients. Results: Meta-analysis results showed that in the total clinical effective rate, liuweidihuang decoction combined with conventional treatment was superior to conventional treatment[Rr=1.24,95%CI(1.19,1.29), P<0.000 01], meanwhile, in decreasing fasting plasma glucose(FBG)[MD=-0.45,95%CI(-0.62,-0.27),P<0.000 01],glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C)[MD=-0.41,95%CI(-0.58,-0.24),P<0.000 01]. Conclusion:It is efficacy and safety that theLiuweidihuangdecoctioncombined with different conventional treatmentsfor type 2 diabetes mellitus. And there is no statistically significant difference between different studies, so it is effective in treating type 2 diabetes mellitusandis not affected by the type of conventional treatment. But the overall quality of the included studies was generally lowquality, the conclusion still needs more high-quality, multi-center randomized triple-block controlled trials to verify.

Key words: Meta-analysis, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Liuweidihuang decoction, Combined therapy of Chinese and Western medicine, Randomized controlled trail (RCT)

中图分类号: