• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

中国药物评价 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 384-390.

• 药品评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗炎保肝药物治疗抗精神病药致肝损伤的有效性和安全性Meta分析

 李珊珊, 张嘉俊, 李江娅, 张欣月, 林浩畅, 杨雅清, 翁稚颖*   

  1. 昆明医科大学药学院/云南省天然药物药理重点实验室, 云南 昆明 650500
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-27 修回日期:2020-09-11 出版日期:2020-10-28 发布日期:2020-10-28
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81860012 腺苷酸环化酶AC2亚型在慢性阻塞性肺病疾病发病中的作用及其分子机制研究)

Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-inflammatory and Liver-protecting Drugs in the Treatment of Liver Injury by Antipsychotic Drugs

  1. School of Pharmaceutical Science & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Pharmacology for Natural Products,
         Kunming Medical University,Yunnan Kunming 650500,China
  • Received:2020-05-27 Revised:2020-09-11 Online:2020-10-28 Published:2020-10-28
  • Contact: Zhi-ying wengweng E-mail:weng_zy@sina.com

摘要: 目的:评价抗炎保肝药物(甘草酸二铵、复方甘草酸苷、双环醇)治疗抗精神病药物所致肝损伤的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Cochrane、PubMed、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普数据库和万方数据库,收集抗炎保肝药物治疗抗精神病药物所致肝损伤的随机对照试验。按纳入与排除标准筛选文献、提取资料。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入11篇随机对照试验,862例患者。Meta分析结果显示,试验组与对照组中总有效率[OR=6.22,95% CI(3.54,10.94),P<0.000 01]、丙氨酸氨基转移酶[MD=-25.22,95% CI(-36.57,-13.87),P<0.000 1]、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶[MD=-16.07,95%CI(-25.27,-6.86),P=0.000 6],差异有统计学意义;不良反应发生率 [OR=1.01,95% CI(0.57,1.80),P=0.97],差异无统计学意义。结论:与其他保肝药相比,抗炎保肝药能明显提高抗精神病药物所致肝损伤的临床疗效、改善肝功能各项指标,不良反应发生率较其他保肝药差异无统计学意义。

关键词: font-size:medium, ">抗炎保肝药;抗精神病药物;药物性肝损伤;安全性;有效性;Meta分析

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective drugs (diammonium glycyrrhizinate, compound glycyrrhizin, bicyclol) in the treatment of the liver injury caused by antipsychotic drugs. Methods: Searched the Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and Wan Fang Data to collect randomized controlled trials of anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective drugs for liver damage caused by antipsychotic drugs. Filter documents and extract data according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted using Rev Man 5.3 software. Results: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 862 patients. The total effective rate in the test group and the control group [OR=6.22, 95% CI (3.54, 10.94), P<0.000 01], ALT [MD=-25.22, 95% CI (-36.57, -13.87), P<0.000 1], AST [MD=-16.07, 95% CI (-25.27, -6.86), P=0.000 6], the difference is statistically significant. The incidence of adverse reactions [OR=1.01, 95% CI (0.57, 1.80),P=0.97]. The difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Compared with other hepatoprotective drugs, anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective drugs can significantly improve the clinical efficacy of liver injury caused by antipsychotic drugs and improve various indicators of liver function. The incidence of adverse reactions is not statistically different compared with other hepatoprotective drugs. 

Key words: font-size:medium, ">Anti-inflammatory Liver-protecting drugs; Antipsychotic drugs; Drug-induced liver injury; Safety; Effectiveness; Meta-analysis

中图分类号: