• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

中国药物评价 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 474-482.

• 循证医学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

甲氨蝶呤联合米非司酮治疗异位妊娠的系统评价

   程畅, 姜帅, 董梅*   

  1. 哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150081
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-14 修回日期:2020-09-17 出版日期:2020-12-28 发布日期:2020-12-28
  • 基金资助:
    中华医学会临床药学分会2018年度临床药学科研基金青年项目(项目编号:320.6750.19090-42)

Systematic Review of Methotrexate Combined with Mifepristone in the Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy

  1. Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital,Heilongjiang Harbin 150081, China
  • Received:2020-07-14 Revised:2020-09-17 Online:2020-12-28 Published:2020-12-28

摘要: 目的:综合评价甲氨蝶呤联合米非司酮治疗异位妊娠的有效性和安全性,为临床治疗提供科学依据。方法:计算机检索EMBase、PubMed、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、维普数据库(VIP)、万方科技、Cochrane 图书馆临床对照试验资料库等数据库,同时筛查纳入的参考文献,纳入甲氨蝶呤联合米非司酮治疗异位妊娠的随机对照试验(各数据库检索时间均从建库至2020年4月)。由两名评价员独立评价文献质量、提取资料并交叉核对,并进行方法学质量评价和采用RevMan5.3的软件进行Meta分析。 结果:本研究共纳入25篇文献,包括2 399例患者。Meta分析结果显示,在有效性方面,应用甲氨蝶呤联合米非司酮组总有效率与对照组相比有显著性差异,总有效率[RR=1.26,95%CI(1.22,1.31),P<0.000 01]。治疗组β-HCG转阴时间[WMD=-8.44,95%CI(-9.68,-7.20),P<0.000 01]、腹痛消失时间[WMD=-8.03,95%CI(-10.57,-5.49),P<0.000 01]、阴道止血时间[WMD=-9.27,95%CI(-10.24,-8.30),P<0.000 01]及包块消失时间[WMD=-10.71,95%CI(-12.87,-8.54),P<0.000 01]均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义。在安全性方面,治疗组不良反应发生率与对照组无显著性差异。结论:基于现有临床证据,甲氨蝶呤联合米非司酮组在治疗异位妊娠均较单独应用甲氨蝶呤或米非司酮效果更优。但因纳入研究文献数量较少,研究质量不齐,此结论尚需更多大样本、高质量临床随机对照试验予以证实。
   

关键词: font-size:medium, ">甲氨蝶呤;米非司酮;异位妊娠;系统评价

Abstract: Objective: Comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of methotrexate combined with mifepristone in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy, providing scientific basis for clinical treatment. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of methotrexate combined with mifepristone for ectopic pregnancy were searched from the following electronic databases: EMbase、PubMed、CNKI、CBM、VIP、Wanfang and the Cochrane Library(from establish to Apr 2020). Quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Disagreement was resolved through discussion, and data analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 25 articles were included in this study, including 2 399 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that in terms of validity, the total effective rate of the methotrexate compared with mifepristone group was significantly different from that of the control group. The total effective rate[RR=1.26,95%CI(1.22, 1.31),P<0.000 01], such as negative conversion time of blood β-HCG [WMD=-8.44, 95%CI(-9.68, -7.20), P<0.000 01] 、Bellyache disappear time[WMD=-8.03, 95%CI(-10.57,-5.49), P<0.000 01]、 Vaginal hemostasis time[WMD=-9.27,95%CI(-10.24, -8.30), P<0.000 01] and Chunks disappear time [WMD=-10.71,95%CI(-12.87,-8.54),P<0.000 01]. In terms of safety, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the treatment group and the control group. Conclusion: Based on the existing clinical evidence, the methotrexate combined with mifepristone group is more effective than methotrexate or mifepristone alone in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. However, due to the small number of included research literatures and uneven research quality, this conclusion still needs more large samples and high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials to confirm.
 

Key words: font-size:medium, ">Methotrexate; Mifepristone; Ectopic pregnancy; System assessment

中图分类号: