• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

中国药物评价 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 314-320.

• 药品评价 • 上一篇    下一篇

神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗流行性感冒有效性及安全性的系统评价再评价

赵嫔, 王雪梅, 李越, 翁稚颖*   

  1. 昆明医科大学药学院暨云南省天然药物药理重点实验室, 云南 昆明 650500
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-22 修回日期:2024-06-20 出版日期:2024-08-28 发布日期:2024-08-28
  • 基金资助:
    云南省国际科技合作平台-滇美分子药物联合研究中心(No.2015IC001)

The Efficacy and Safety of Neuroaminidase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Influenza: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

  1. School of Pharmacy, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Kunming 650500, China
  • Received:2024-04-22 Revised:2024-06-20 Online:2024-08-28 Published:2024-08-28

摘要:  目的:对神经氨酸酶抑制剂(neuraminidase inhibitor,NAI)治疗流行性感冒(简称流感)有效性及安全性的系统评价/Meta分析(Systematic reviews/Meta analysis,SRs/MRs)进行再评价,以期为该药的临床应用提供循证依据。方法:系统检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据知识服务平台(Wanfang)、维普网(VIP)、中国生物医学文献服务系统(SinoMed)、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science数据库,收集NAI治疗流感的SRs/MRs,评价其原始研究质量,并分别采用AMSTAR-2 量表及GRADE证据分级系统评价文献质量和证据质量。结果:共纳入11篇SRs/MRs,涉及78个结局指标。原始研究为高质量随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT),AMSTAR-2方法学质量评价为低级和极低级;GRADE证据质量评价显示,78个结局指标中级占10.3%,低级占53.8%,极低级占35.9%。结论:现有研究显示NAI治疗儿童、成人及老年人流感具有一定的疗效、安全性,但鉴于系统评价/Meta分析方法学质量及证据质量等级偏低,尚需开展更多高质量研究以获取高质量的研究结果去验证。

关键词: font-size:medium, ">神经氨酸酶抑制剂;流行性感冒;伞状综述;系统评价再评价

Abstract: Objective: To overview the systematic reviews about the efficacy and safety of neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) for the treatment of seasonal influenza, the purpose is to provide factual recommendations for the clinical use of this medicine. Methods: CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to collect the SRs/MRs of NAI in the treatment of influenza,evaluate the quality of its original research and the AMSTAR-2 tool and the GRADE system were used to assess the quality of the literature and the quality of evidence respectively. Results: 11 SRs/MRs were finally included, covering 78 outcome measures. All original research conducted is of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs).The methodological quality assessment using the AMSTAR-2 tool indicated predominantly very low and low quality. The GRADE evidence quality assessment showed that 10.3% of the 78 outcome measures were assessed as moderate grade, 53.8% as low grade, and 35.9% as very low grade. Conclusion: Existing research suggests that NAI treatment has demonstrated certain efficacy and safetyin treating influenza in children, adults, and the elderly. However, given the low methodological quality and the level of evidence from systematic reviews/meta-analyses, further high-quality research is required to validate these results.

Key words: font-size:medium, ">Neuraminidase inhibitor;Influenza;umbrella review;Overviews of systematic reviews

中图分类号: